President Obama has some excellent qualities, such as, he is an excellent orator, he commands and looks like he should be respected (no matter what), and to his credit the drone strikes were a step in the right direction (even though, he bowed to Pakistan, to enable our shipping routes to go thru, instead of demanding it, from a supposed "Allie"). Yet, there are so many glaring problems with the feckless, ineffective foreign policy and his answers to it (without the tel-a-prompter).
There are many examples to his either incompetence, ignorance, or his foreign policy (or lack there of) is what he wants. Right? Well, take a look (except for Bin Laden's death, which any President, except Clinton when he had the chance, and the drone strikes, as stated) at the first example. Not even mentioning Iran's nuclear intentions, what we should do, or anything about it, Iran has 32 different terror groups they either sponsor, help, or are in direct workings with. The Iranian guard, as stated by the Pentagon and several high ranking officials, are in Syria, killing innocent people, committing genocide thru rape, and also have maimed and/or killed over 25,000+ people (which is just what the Red Cross can guess, because it is to dangerous to be in the country full time). What, besides sanctions, which were for the "nuclear program", not anything else, has Obama done about any of this, with Iran? Nothing, is the answer. In fact, he is stonewalling, Israel, stating "we still have time, and negotiations can still work," in his speech at the United Nations, on the 25th of September.
How about Yemen? Yes, the President has used drones there, and killed some key people. However, when the press is reporting Obama will "NOT" meet with any leaders, he met with the leader of Yemen. This is a country brimming with Islamic Terrorists, as stated in "WorldNow.Com" (http://www.WorldNow.Com): (title) "Yemeni Women Say Lives Are Worse, After Revolution" (in the article, it states, from a top woman from the protesters/revolution) "We wanted jobs, security, an end to corruption and an improvement in services, schools, and police (to feel safe). Instead, we can't afford food, there is no electricity, and there are guns everywhere." Now, this on the ground, coupled with the Al-Qeada presence and the militant Islamic groups, all over (minus, the U. S. Anwar Awlaki, who was killed by a drone, but not before a year's worth of plots, including the "underwear bomber," who would have succeeded, if he didn't "sweat the bomb into malfunction."). What has the President done there, what has changed, and out of all the members/leaders he could have met with, why the Yemeni President?
How about the "homeland," our United States of America, is the President doing all he can here? Can a city in this country keep people out of it, if it is an actual city, such as, Kansas City, or even a rural city? Until a couple days ago, or after this article is read, probably people would say, "No, that is discrimination. Anyone should be able to come into a city, or at least drive thru it." Well, not in "Islamaberg, New York, where there are about one hundred, or so, Islamic people (similar to Amish, or Mennonites) living on land, and completely self-sufficient (they have a grocery store, a mosque, and even have a full target range). Yet, it is 100% blocked from the public, and there is a screening, even if you are Muslim. This is bad enough, but is is believed to have been founded by Pakistani cleric Sheikh Mubarak Ali Gilani Hashimi in 1980. Gilani, who lives in Pakistan and was questioned there in connection with the abduction of Daniel Pearl, founded the group on a trip to the United States. Members initially engaged mostly in attacks against Indians and Indian religious figures in the US. However, the fact there is nobody allowed in, or around the city, which is bad enough, there are radicals in the city and in the U. S., but they have also committed multiple attacks on the U. S. and other places. Although various members have been suspected of assassinations and other acts of terror perpetrated in the 1980s and later, and some members having been charged with conspiracy to commit first degree murder and other crimes, al-Fuqra itself is not listed as a terror group by the US or the EU (it was listed as a terrorist organization in the 1999 Patterns of Global Terrorism report by the U.S. State Department.). News reports have attempted to connect "shoe bomber" Richard Reid and "Washington sniper" John Allen Muhammad to al-Fuqra, but the connections were not definitive. There are also allegations that Clement Rodney Hampton-El, one of the plotters who planned to blow up different New York City bridges and tunnels, was a member of Al Fuqra. The group has been banned in Pakistan. Jamaat Al Fuqra was also involved in the planned bombing of a Hindu temple in Toronto, Canada in 1991. This is not the only "city/community", but the Pentagon says, "In rural America, there could be over 100 of these "Muslim Cities." Therefore, why have there not been any reports on this, or why has President Obama not went in to take a look, or even use the FBI to go in and check. He has done it for "far right terrorist groups in the U. S."?
The conclusion, is summed up best (believe it, or not) by the New York Times, today (http://www.TheNewYorkTimes.Com). They state, with named sources, "President Obama has up ended three decades of the United States of America's relations, with it's most stall wort ally in the Middle East and the Arab World (sic), putting the weight of the U. S. squarely on the side of the Arab Street. It was a risky move by the President, flying in the face of the advice of his elders on his staff, at the State Dept., and also at the Pentagon." If the New York Times can see the problems with snubbing the prime minister of Israel, all the leaders (except the President of Yemen) of the Middle East (while it is literally on fire, everyday), and the fact Libya's consulate and the U. S. Ambassador Chris Stevens (even though he warned of I. E. D./Improvised Explosive Devices, R. P. G. attacks and gun battles, plus the new tape from Al-Qaeda and the fact it was 9-11) and three other Americans dead, as our consulate was stormed in a terror attack. Knowing that any attack on an embassy, or consulate, is an act of war (not counting killing and dragging Ambassadors behind cars and sodomizing them). What has Obama done? He actually, indirectly (by blaming the "video trailer," offending the profit mohamed, aired six months ago. Even sending the U. N. Ambassador Susan Rice, to all 5 Sunday Morning News Shows, to tell this story, and sticking with it, half the time, today and in his speech to the United Nations on the 25th), lied to the American people and continues to do so. Libya's consulate was under guarded and nobody in the White House paid any attention to the date (9/11, the day of the attack and protests in Egypt), what could happen, and it was almost like Obama forgot about 9/11 altogether. Instead, he went to Las Vegas, Colorado, the Hispanic Convention Dinner, and two other fundraisers, plus flight time, in the 48 hours during and after the Libya Terrorist Attack (something Obama has yet to fully say in a complete sentence, "Libya was terrorist attack.").
The President is showing, right now, how clueless he is, by not coming out to the American people and giving a speech, to let us know what the United States, who pays his salary, what his plans are. He came into the White House Feckless and full of words. I believe the phrase is, "All hat and no cattle." One thing is for sure, if President Obama is re-elected, he better get some intestinal fortitude, because his decisions to date, have made us less safe, all the radicals in the whole Middle East and Africa want the Americans/"infidels" dead, and a Muslim Caliphate, across the world. A scary proposition.
Copyright. Dman@TheThoughtSpigot.Com
Http://TheThoughtSpigot.Com
