Monday, September 14, 2009

Peddling Racism, Reverse Racism & Being a Racist

Copyright. "The Thought Spigot"



Race has been an issue in life, for as long as people have lived on earth. You pick a time in history and there will be racism attached, at some point, with some people (The Crusades, countless countries bringing cheap labor by skin color, hate of religion associated with color, and so on). Of course, America has had slavery of African Americans, pushing Indians to reservations and taking their land, and countless deaths, assassinations, deaths behind trucks, and shootings of Latino, Islamic, and other people of color. Yet, America has also preserved more freedom, fed more people and saved more lives around the world, than any other country in history. However, since Barack Obama has become President (NOT THE BLACK PRESIDENT, just the President of the United States), race is being used to bludgeon and silence the majority of people, in the United States. Pundits, news anchors, the majority of the media, and people around the country (usually with a progressive/liberal agenda), are forcing the majority of Americans, who are Caucasian, to live in fear of being "racist," forcing people to not speak out (out of fear of what others will say) and not live out and do what they believe in, for the same.

Just a few examples, from a scope of all over the media grid:

1. David Shuster, from Chris Mathews "Hardball" fame (now an MSNBC pundit/anchor) http://msnbc.com/, said this, "you look at the image of the Republican party, all white males, short cropped hair, they look sort of angry, no women, no minorities, and it looks like they have sort of become unhinged." In actuality, the picture Shuster is referring to, is a picture of nine republicans, in the Congressional Forum. It is not a picture of all of the Republican congressman, but just nine. So, is that an accurate representation, when Michael Steele is the head of the GOP (a black man, who is loosing his hair, and a Republican)?

2. HBO's "Real Time With Bill Maher," (http://hbo.com/) Maher says (showing a picture of Obama's face and shoulders), "I just want to show you what I mean by "subliminally racist" (showing the picture), this is from the 'Drudge Report' (http://drudgereport.com/) and we are not making this up, Poll Hell: Obama Negs Rise, Negs meaning Negative, but I just seem to think with a certain number of people, when they see 'Negs Rise", well you know.?" So, I assume newspapers and web site are no allowed to abbreviate the word Negative, with Neg., without inciting racist rants and liberal/progressive attack machines smacking them down and degrading them?

Yet, right after this quote from Maher, he goes on to make "racist" (by his/liberal standards) fake comments from the Drudge Report, "Obama Meets Old White Man," "Obama Embraces Joe Momma" (referring to Joe Biden's mother), and "Hoein' The Garden" (showing pictures of Michelle Obama, working in the garden). Of course this is "progressive/liberal satirical humor," to Maher, but there is no difference, as he just picks and chooses to make his ideological points).

3. During the MTV Music Awards (http://mtv.com/), Kanye West jumped on stage, during Taylor Swift's acceptance speech (for best video of the year), took the microphone, and made the comment "Beyonce had one of the best videos of all-time." (Insinuating, Swift didn't deserve the award, and partially won it, as she was a white country/cross over singer, from American Idol.) Yet, his apology in a text message, was "....I will apologize to Taylor tomorrow, welcome to the Real World!!!! Everybody wanna booooo me, but I'm a fan of "Real Pop Culture"!!!! No disrespect.....)

These three examples, from three different types of media, people of different color, and how the media portrayed them, is beyond the pail. If Tim McGraw jumped on stage and took the microphone away from Kanye West, and then said, "Faith Hill had one of the best videos of all-time," everyone in the media would go nuts, call him a redneck racist and a text message apology would never do. If Bill O'Reilly (http://foxnews.com/) ran a story saying, "This picture of democrats (showing only nine of them) was for environmentally damaging the inner city, wants complete and total socialism and work for ACORN." He would be hammered flat, by the liberal and unforgiving people on the left. People are being forced to cower down and wonder if what they say will be made out to be racist, or possibly worse, become an example (in the day of phone cameras and small recorders).

There is more to racism than just black and white. American Muslim people, Latino, Illegal Aliens, people in the gay/lesbian communities, and countless other groups are all crying foul. However, where are the solutions, other than backing white people into a corner? Saying 75,000 people marching on Washington (for health reform, and other policies against Barack Obama) getting no coverage (except for Fox News, the blogosphere and a few papers) and the coverage it did receive, was tepid at best. David Axelrod, Obama's top advisor, said over the weekend, "These people do not represent the people of the country." Really? What country and group do they represent? Are they all racist and wanting the heads of people, because of color? I do not think so. All of these examples happened in just the last 4-5 days (if you go back over the past six weeks, there are hundreds of examples of reverse racism, pigeon hole language, and flat out lies to the American people, to keep them in check and mainly to keep whites out of the way, for an agenda).

In fact, all of the people who are coming out in droves, spewing out the filth and race card at every turn (because people do not like Barack Obama's policies, not the color of his skin), and are utilizing "Straum Thurman" against (Rep. S. C.) Joe Wilson did not dream up this scheme/way to pigeon hole/control the white populations freedom of speech, over night. They have been laying the ground work for 12-15 years now. This is a carefully thought out proposal, from ACORN to MSNBC going all in a two years before Obama's coronation, to the constant beat of drums by networks (FSTV-Free Speech TV, http://freespeech.org/ and Link TV, http://linktv.org/) and other organizations (SEIU, NARAL, etc..etc..), all orchestrated by George Soros and other "wizards behind the curtain." All orchestrated to make sure the liberal/progressive movement passes, minorities and the poor are getting redistributed wealth, and most importantly to keep the conservatives and whites in check, silent, and scared to work, speak out and do the correct things (they believe in).

Racism is about a person who does not like/hates another for color, and it works both ways. For every white/Caucasian who hates a black/Afro-American, there is an black who hates a white (same for every homosexual who wants rights, over heterosexuals and "The Constitution", there are heterosexuals who are good with the way things are, just shutting up). The fringes are covered with freaks, fanatics, and all kinds of people who are just furthering an agenda and pushing hate. However, the problem is not the "fringes," but the people in the White House, Congress, and in power, bolstered by the pundits and people with huge agendas, pushing and pushing agendas the majority does not want, which will cause unintended consequences. The groups/people in power, wanting big government, universal health care and pushing a race card are isolating moderate and conservative whites, Muslims, and other groups, as well. When a person does not know if it is ok to say, what is on their mind, they will find a way to express themselves and they will also not stay quiet long.

Let everyone think before they speak, want the best for the country and not themselves, and allow themselves to step out of their comfort zone to become themselves. If this doesn't happen, there will be enough blow back, verbal and physical casualities, as people only take so much, before they take matters into their own hands.

Monday, August 24, 2009

Bill O'Reilly Sits In The Cat Bird Seat, With Master Plan

Copyright. "The Thought Spigot"
Love him, or hate him, Bill O'Reilly is truly a master at what he does, on "The No Spin Zone," on the Fox Channel. The man has vast knowledge, does his research, (as a rule) utilizes his opinions without to much conservative/liberal partisanship (on President Obama), and he has the vast power, of the most watched cable show, on television (for the last 8 years). "The Factor," is killing the cable outlets news shows, and is now competing with CBS, NBC, and ABC, at the prime time slots (something which has never happened before). However, the main focus on O'Reilly's genius, regarding President Barack Obama, is his reason for performing a "Barbaro," in passing the competition.

About four to five months, pre-election, Mr. O'Reilly was neutral on Barack Obama, his policies, and the overall outlook. Instead of Bill giving his opinion, or putting himself on the record, he has people like Glenn Beck, Michelle Malkin, and others to do it for him. This is allowing "The Factor" to continue to make points on President Obama, but Bill is not putting himself out there (on the President falling numbers and big decisions). His interview with Barack (before the election), was more soft ball, than the normal hard hitting interviews (see the O'Reilly vs. Barney Frank interview/fight, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAuOEdttjZQ). Before the election and after the interview, O'Reilly still continued to play the middle of the road, keeping his core Republicans watching and the smaller portion of Independents, Democrats, and others. Then he ditched the "Factor," on the radio, to concentrate on just one solid hour, in prime time. This choice allowed him to not be live, for three hours, five days a week, where a gaff, partisan speak and/or Barack bashing would be an easy slip up (as in my opinion, he is no Obama fan).

Barack Obama then became President of the United States, but O'Reilly did not fall into the trap of picking a side, hammering him (like Shawn Hannity) or "getting a tingling feeling up his leg," (like Chris Mathews). Pre-election, on MSNBC, Chris Mathews "Hardball," with the rest of MSNBC and most of CNN jumped at the chance to take sides and root for the new President (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izjJRkDFcYA). However, while the country continued to turn the channel from the print media, prime time news, MSNBC and CNN, to "The Factor." His ratings naturally shot off the charts shot off the charts. Staying (for the most part) neutral on Obama and all he brings to the country, he is now enjoying six million viewers a night, ranking second on all of cable television, while MSNBC and CNN are in the mid to late twenties. O'Reilly is truly in the cat bird seat, as he is watches Barack Obama's numbers on Health Care and the country having a percentage of 40% who "Strongly Oppose" Obama's running of the country (while 28% strongly agree). As he has not taken any sides, on Obama himself, Bill O'Reilly can now do what all the other channels cannot (without flip flopping), and that is to be able to have a 100% fresh opinion (one way, or another, good, or bad) on Obama's "Cap and Trade," "Universal/Public Government Option Health Care." The farther he drops in the polls, the more O'Reilly can hammer away, because he was the only one who did not voice an actual opinion.

In his most recent article (on August 20, 2009), on President Obama, O'Reilly said, "It has been a rough summer for Mr. Obama. The economy continues to wobble, the Afghan war is brutal, and the health care chaos has diminished the president in the eyes of many Americans. His leadership on that vital issue has been inconsistent and, at times, downright confusing." Like on "The Factor," O'Reilly stays clear of "Hannity and Rush Limbaugh tactics, and just states facts, as the bills (the six from Democrats and three from Republicans, on health care) do not have specifics and congressmen/Senators do not have the numbers for the public. O'Reilly continues, in the same article, "I believe it is important that no one yell at President Obama during his vacation. He has certainly had enough of that recently. He needs some peace-some down time. He needs to recharge using the Vineyard sun and wind. The president must get away from talk radio, tea bag protesters, and cap and trade." These subtle tactics, with just facts, polls, and letting the pundits (Glenn Beck, Malkin http://hotair.com/, Juan Williams and others) to do the work for him.

Although, Obama's vacation and time table to produce two major bills is almost upon him, and O'Reilly will be able to say "I was for Barack Obama, and wanted him to succeed" (which he has actually said, on his web site http://www.foxnews.com/bios/talent/oreilly/ and on "The Factor." There is a reason why Bill O'Reilly and Fox News (http://foxnews.com/) are the most powerful and hated (by liberals and some others) television channel, and they have had the correct plan all along. O'Reilly has been stating the facts, polls, and has not been critical of Obama at all (if you watch his show). The day of reckoning for Barack Obama is almost here, and Bill is in a win-win situation. Whether he (Obama) becomes the next JFK, or he becomes the President who bankrupted and killed the country, O'Reilly will only get stronger and stronger, with better ratings. Bottom line, Bill O'Reilly is already number one, and now he is headed (in the next 4-6 months) to stardom seldom seen by news men/women. If the country was not so partisan and divided, he would become the next Walter Cronkite, or Dan Rather (before he showed his liberal spots, in everything). As long as Bill stays away from the "power trip," quits constantly quoting how good his numbers/ratings are, and stays away from the "blondes of Fox News," he simply can't lose.

Copyright. "The Thought Spigot"
http://thethoughtspigot.com/

Sunday, August 23, 2009

SUNDAY MORNING SHOWS LEAVE MORE QUESTIONS

Every Sunday, there are three major news/opinion shows of record: "Meet The Press," "Sunday With Chris Wallace," and "This Week With George Stephanopoulos." These shows, every week, have the most controversial and important news events of the week, and are filled with countless Congressmen, Senators, military people, pundits, and even past cabinet members. However, these television shows are important and are supposed to be filled with complete journalistic integrity, without moderators showing partiality. As these three shows are not opinion/op. ed., and the hosts are to be the same, just posing questions and facts, doing there very best to not be partial, partisan, or using "soft ball questions" on some, hammering others.

These three television programs, this past Sunday, was filled with a great topic (Health Care/Universal Health Care/Health Care Reform, depending on whom you ask, to explain the topic name). On "Meet The Press," anchored by David Gregory, had Sen. Charles Schumer and Sen. Orin Hatch debating. On "Sunday With Chris Wallace (on Fox)" Sen. Arlen Specter and two people from the V. A. (talking about the "Death Care/End of Life Choices" brochure, which is still on the VA web site ( http://www.va.gov/ ). Last, but not least, Clinton Appointee "George Stephanopoulos" had Sen. John McCain, who spoke on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, plus health care.

There are bills from the Democrats (4-6), (3) from the Republicans, but there are no bills on Health Care Reform from President Obama. Obama has given the whole "Health Care Reform" chore, to everyone but himself, even though health care is 15-20% (depending on what happens and how much is spent in the current situation). The American people are finally starting to wake up to what the problems of revamping the whole health care system, the fact Republicans have been locked out of talks (like with Tarp 2, Omnibus, and the other bills passed since Obama has become President of the United States), and how important every choice is becoming for the country and it's people. Therefore, anyone reading this should try to figure out what makes more sense, in the following quotes (I did not go with every person who was on the Sunday shows, as they mostly stuck to "talking points", but I did pick three out from the President and John McCain):

1. Barack Obama has seemed to back away from the "public option on health care," but refuses to say he will not rule it out completely, in 2009. However, this is what he said on November 22, 2004, in an interview with Randi Rhodes (a personality on Air America, conducted on http://youtube.com/). Obama said, "When you rush these budgets that are a foot high and nobody has any idea what's in them and nobody has read them, it gets rushed through without any clear deliberation, or debate. Then these kinds of things happen, and I think that this is in some ways what happened to the Patriot Act. I mean you remember that there was no real debate about that. It was so quick, after 9/11, that it was introduced people felt very intimidated by the administration.

2. Recently in an interview, on the radio, with Michael Smerconish, Barack Obama said this, "I am confident we will get it (health care) done, and as far as negotiations with the Republicans, my attitude has ALWAYS been let's see if we can get this done, with some consensus. I would love to have more Republicans engaged in the process. I think early on they (Republicans and Independents) a decision was made by the Republican leadership, to not give anything and maybe we can get a replay of the 1993 health care bill." (the 1993 "HillaryCare Bill" was defeated and the Republicans took control of the House and Senate, in 1994)

3. John McCain said, "Now would be a good time, as the President's numbers are falling fast on health care. To get both parties, with the President, together. Realize, Obama has NO PLAN. They have been made by the congress and Senate, but NOT with the Administration. Then we can all sit down and speak our minds and our pieces, then Obama can say WHAT HE WANTS."

After reading this and watching the Sunday shows (what people from all parties said, if you did), who sounds and is showing leadership here? President Obama has said, several times, "I do not care if it takes 15 to 20 years to get 'Universal Health Care', if it is not passed soon." Then there is the lack of details, numbers, and the fact nobody has given the overall, CONCRETE outlook on how much this will all cost. Americans must continue to look at this issue, and make sure it is what you wish. The people from the V. A. talked about "End of Life Issues," because of being in a wheel chair, possibly having post traumatic stress (one of the questions is actually, "can you not shake the blues"), and some other things in black and white (on the V. A. web site above). There is no time, but the present, to make sure the government and Barack Obama (who doesn't have a bill, or really any specifics, to his name) do not take the country into a slope of "If you are not worth anything to the government, then you should just die." Only you can do the research, read the web site ( http://whitehouse.gov/), and arm yourself with knowledge and wisdom.

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Congressman Conyers, Others To Busy To Read & Do Their Job

Copyright. "The Thought Spigot"
Http://TheThoughtSpigot.Com"

When a person is elected, by the people, to represent the people, it bodes well for them to do the very best job they can do for everyone, not for themselves. However, being a local, state, national representative of any kind "IS A JOB!" It is not supposed to be vacations (3-6 times a year) in Nantucket, Cabo San Lucas , or wherever else their hearts desire. As a rule, most jobs do not offer people who do not work 40 hours a week, for a full year, a vacation at all. Then, after that year, they receive some kind of "full time employee package," like a weeks vacation, health care, and maybe some kind of profit sharing (while the vacation and profit sharing goes up, for a normal person, as time/years go on). Therefore, why are congressman/women, the Senate, and President of the United States balking and some outright stating, they will not be reading the health care bill (like they did with the Stimulus, Omnibus, and other bills which have been rammed thru to law, by the democrat clad House, Senate, and President)?

John Conyers, Jr. Michigan's Democratic 14th District Congressman, stated on the floor of Congress today, “I love these members, they get up and say, ‘Read the bill,’” said Conyers. What good is reading the bill if it’s a thousand pages and you don't have two days and two lawyers to find out what it means after you read the bill?” This Health Care Overhaul is 20% of the U. S. economy, it is 1017 pages long (at present time), has more entitlements (33), 53 new offices/bureaus/bigger government, it uses the word "SHELL" (as in shell corporation, shell money scheme, etc..) 1683 times and it could bankrupt America (LITERALLY). This does not seem to bother Conyers, as he will be going on his first vacation (after just 6 months in office this year, in a recession, no bill done at the Presidents behest, and the American people getting more and more angry) in just a handful of days (3). Conyers just told the American people he would not be reading the most important bill, possibly in American history, because it is to long and he doesn't have two attorneys (yet he is voting yes, regardless, as he stated on the floor of Congress). Would you get fired, or laid off, if you went about your job in this way? The answer is yes, you would be fired, if you still have a job (as the unemployment rate is over 10% now, in America).

Instead of Conyers and other congressman/women, senators, and (most important) President Obama delaying their vacations, in order to get America's people back to work, have better (not government, but better) health care, and fixing the U. S. economy (not to mention Israel, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, and now China complaining about the U. S. debt). However, that is not going to happen. In fact, all will go home for a while and then will go onto vacationing hot spots (where they will be some of the only ones there, after Obama's speaking out against those going to Reno, Vegas, and other spots for conventions and business). Conyers himself is going home, in order to impose (like the democrats want in the health bill) government's standards on your life and health. His latest press release, at http://conyers.house.gov/ (if you wish to see the whole "1984" democratic plan for health care):

"No Family Left Inside: Tips on Healthy Living"
11 AM – 3 PM
Saturday, August 1, 2009



Please join Congressman Conyers this Saturday to find out about recreation activities available for people of all ages, nutrition tips from experts and other ways to keep your family healthy. Summer-theme foods will be provided. Guests: Dr. Lynn Smitherman (pediatrician and assistant professor at Wayne State) Big Lou Campbell (personal trainer), Greening of Detroit, Detroit Police Athletic League (invited) and Detroit Parks and Recreation (invited).

While Conyers and other democrats will go back to their districts and states to try and sway the American people, to vote yes on a health bill to control (almost all) facets of citizens lives, listen to what they are wanting to do. Just a handful of things in the bill and/or what the outcome will be from the bill. The government has put forth taxing video games (so kids will go play outside), snacks (to fight obesity), soda/pop, and then all of the taxes which will naturally raise from the owners/production people of all things (food, energy, and just about anything you can think of, the government will have to gain revenue). Then, the government telling Americans (by taxing) what to eat, how to live, how thin/fat to be, and generally intervening in the lives of all citizens, for its own gain. While the "elected officials, who are all individually wealthy and make over $150,000 a year (in salary alone), are not effected by any of these things. In fact, they can't even bother "without two days and two attorneys" to read bills and do their own jobs. However, I hope they all have a great vacation, since the rest of America will be struggling and killing themselves to "just make do."


Copyright. "The Thought Spigot"

http://www.thethoughtspigot.com/

Sunday, July 26, 2009

Obama's Mistakes Are His Fault & Were Predictable


A complete "Cap & Trade" and "Universal Health Care Overhaul" was to have transpired and become law, by next Friday (before the "August Recess"). Instead, Obama's quest to bankrupt America has fallen short (of actual good government and short on the President's time table), all on Capital Hill and President Obama will be off on VACATION. Less than six full months on the job, Barack Obama and family, will rent a $38,000 a week (they are staying a week). Although, what is failing to be seen and figured, is the White House's personal chefs, personal cleaners and staff, the countless private security (which is needed, for the President), and finally the to and from of jet fuel. All of these things will be a vacation, for Obama and his family, totaling about $240-310 million (jet fuel alone, will be close to $100,000). In a time, in our country's history, when the economy, countless unemployed (more than 300,000 new unemployed a month, and no end in sight), and the basic man is struggling to cool their homes, buy insurance, and other problems the "upper crust" of Washington will never experience.

There have been virtually no promises, from the campaign trail, to the White House, to six months into the Presidency few things President Obama have come true, or were drastic mistakes. Going around the world, apologizing for America and the "Carbon Emissions" the country has out (when China, India, and Pakistan the three fastest growing economies refuse to change their pollution policies, which would negate America's contribution, if we were to cut out all of our emissions), spewing a police department is "stupid" (on a case he admitted, "I do not know all the facts on") in front of the country, plus the promise of "If the stimulus package is passed, then unemployment will not fall below 8.0% (when the stimulus package was rushed thru congress, not read before being voted on, and yet the unemployment rate is hovering around 9.6-10.7%, depending on the exact figures used). It seems very hard to understand how a vacation is in order, for any of these people. In fact, just these things in general, should have all of these people impeached and/or fired. After all, that is what would happen, if they were working a real job (a job 99% of Americans work at), there is no doubt they would all be gone, not on vacation.

Finally, American should pray the citizens have come to their senses, because President Obama's approval rating is below 50% (48%) for the first time. This may have a lot to do with Health Care, Cap & Tax, and then again the people of America have had enough with Barack Obama the person. Where people speculated and were sucked into the "Hope and Change" theme of President Obama's primary and early days in office (almost star struck and lacking in facts, which is what the media, pundits, democratic leverage men (like David Axelrod and Rahm Emanuel), and others like Rev. Jeremiah Wright, etc...etc...). However, I was not one of these people, in past entries/articles from June to February, I documented there could not be a real agent of change (or positive change), behind Obama's eyes (by the company he kept, the way he got very high politically at a meteoric rise, and how what was said behind closed doors, didn't vet with what was coming out on the stump). Ex. See Joe "the Plumber" and Obama's "Spreading the wealth comment, "The Real Obama" (an article I wrote about what Obama's Presidency would be like, which is stunningly right on), and the countless other articles others and I have written, ahead of the date, and came out right over 95% of the time (at least on my end, articles). The twenty years in Jeremiah Wright's racist, anti-Semetic, and pro-Arab church, to the Bill Ayers and Chicago ties (lending Obama to have risen to high to fast, making things look, as if, he was vaulted to the Presidency on the backs of the media, high powered liberal players and his own choices), there are the Tony Rezco (just one of Obama's friends, for years, who is now under federal indigtment) and finally there was the "San Francisco Values Speech."

The "S. F. Values Speech" alone, where Barack Obama said, "people in the middle parts of the country (referring to Pennsylvania and more of "fly over country", not the coasts and elites) cling to their Bibles, guns, and their antipathy to those who are different colors, religions and just different than they are, make them less" making them not "elites/liberals/progressives." President Obama does not need a vacation, when he has made strong statements, saying, "Health Care" and "Cap & Tax" must be passed by the August recess. There is only one reason 100 blue dog democrats (democrats who are fiscally responsible and also are in the same vein of some republican thoughts/ideas, i.e. guns, religions, etc..) and all the republicans are not going to vote for the Health Care abomination. It is not good for the country, it will kill the job market (to the tune of 15-19%, in the next 1-2 years), and finally it could bankrupt America. Seriously, the C. B. O. (Congressional Budget Organization, an independent and bipartisan group) says the deficit will grow to the $4-10 Trillion range in the next 3-5 years, jobs will stagnate and will not come back, and finally they said there will not be any change for the better in the Health Care overhaul, but in turn, it will wreck the health care system of America. A system where everyone, who has the money, comes to get their care, have surgeries, and gets major problems solved (something the nation can't afford, in multiple ways, being as there are no Hollywood and/or Washington elites going to England for surgeries.) Barack Obama wants these last two bills jammed thru, as fast as humanly possible (even if the people elected do not read the bills), in order to get them passed, in action, and well before more Americans can learn more. Does that sound like the "Change You Can Trust In?" Does this sound like a President who wants what he wants, because he and his family will never be effected (because they are multi-millionares, like most of the people who want these things), so he wants his ideologies to prosper (whether good for the country and the people want them, or not), regardless of the consequences.

Copyright. "The Thought Spigot"
http://www.thethoughtspigot.com/