Saturday, May 29, 2010

Notre Dame Smacks #7 Cornell, To Go To NCAA LaCrosse Finals


Notre Dame came out today and just handed the #7 team in the land, a smacking 12-7. Notre Dame who snuck into the field as a "Bubble Team," unranked, has beaten three power house lacrosse teams, to get to play on Memorial Day. Neil Hicks with four goals, the defense stiffling the Cornell power offense, and Scott Rogers (6'4'' 250 lbs.) with stellar play in goal, is what powered the Irish past "The Big (or not so big) Red."


They will play either Duke #5 (who they beat earlier in the year, dramatically, but lead by the number one scorer Ned Crotty and C. J. Crostefield), or the #1 team in the land (with the best player in the land, in Shamel Bratton). Bratton, if they do beat Duke, can single handedly beat a team, he is that good. However, Notre Dame has the bragging rights, as of now, going to the finals, as an unranked team (the first time since UMASS in 2006).

It would be nice for an Irish Title in something, since the NCAA Basketball team laid an egg, two years in a row. :)

Peace, God Bless, and Go IRISH!!!!!!

copyright. DMAN/Mike @ The Thought Spigot

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

The Acropolis, 24/7 News, Hollywood, & Individual Choice




All people, throughout time, have had many different platforms to state their cases. The Acropolis, Theatre of Dionysus, "The Temple" (of Biblical times, where all branches and theological statements/beliefs came from), to the more recent places (Shakespeare's ) Globe Theatre, and so on. Past the turn of the 20th century, came silent movies, television, color television, and then major theatrical theatre and big budget movies. In the beginning, these famous and infamous places were where people came from all around, to hear others speak and hear the thoughts, politics, and overall big ticket items of the day (including religion, war, and the world, as they/people thought they knew it).

Throughout history, there have always been places and people who utilized the opportunity of the day, to embark on what they believed in to change times and people. However, as technology and the world "advanced," in the early to mid-1920's, there was a huge switch in bringing information and a person's ideas, to the forefront. Instead, there became a wave of "a person not going to here the issues they wanted" to "the issues and whatever slant that came with them, coming to the person." The whistle of the "Andy Griffith Show" is unmistakable to the majority of the world, whether you have seen an episode, or not. As time has gone on, the "Family Ties," "Mary Tyler Moore Show," "The Cosby Show" with a bevy of other quality watching (quality meaning very few, if any, double innuendo television, yet still tackling issues of the day) shows, for families has gone by the way side. In their places, have come shows like "The Simpsons," "Family Guy," "Glee," "South Park" and "Lost" filling the airwaves with anti-family, pro-homosexual, and a general degradation of the family, conservative thought, and overall a filling of most episodes with Anti-Christian thought(s).

Same is for the news, or what actually acts as the news, today. "Time," "Life," "Walter Cronkite" and others in the 50's thru the late 1980's brought a close to balanced shot, to the people, in their homes, every night. While their has always been a pressure for political dominance of the minds of the people, in America and the world, there has never been such a revolt, as the last 15-20 years has shown. Where the "main stream media" was the place to go, for the actual facts, pictures and stories showing Vietnam (in a war time footage, not in a story about the war), not slamming and taking slant sides, and most of all not invading the homes of America with an agenda. Then came the 24 hour news cycle and the Net, which has changed the world and the way people look at the news forever. When a man/woman could have gone to work, come home and watched the news, read a newspaper, or the majority of top esteemed periodicals, they could work and get the news, raise a family and not try to be swayed into a liberal/conservative point of view. Yet, in today's world, the majority of people in the U. S. are saying, "I don't have time to look at multiple web sites, read multiple views and papers, I have a family to raise and a life to live." This is where the problem comes in, people are generally in a state of apathy, and they will ingest anything fed to them. Which is the point of what is coming out of the tube, the Net, and print in general.

This does not even count the "Hollywood Effect." Movies like "Lions for Lambs," "In the Valley of Ellah," and "Avatar," have come out with agendas, for the left. Of course there are far right/right/conservative movies, with the same agenda, to make more conservative voters, or to get a conservative point of view out. However, looking at Hollywood, aside from "Passion of the Christ" and Kirk Cameron's "Fireproof" how many "TRUE" right wing/far right movies are out, and if compared it is about 20 to 1 (far left movies to far right, coming out). Hollywood has transformed itself, over the years (just taking from the last 10 years) from bashing President Bush, the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars, to making a concerted effort to "go green." Actually, making the "Go Green" (not talking about the people who do not want to pollute the earth, or do their parts in life to make the earth a better place) effort, into the new religion of the day. If we lived in the times of the "Jewish Temple" (around Christ's time), there would be a massive effort thru speak, story, and fable/falsehood to show (like in AVATAR) the "Green Effort," "Cap and Trade" and so on, is trying to replace God, and make the "Green Revolution" a Religion. The "Green Church" is not even proven science, but to look at the news, Net, papers, magazines, major "stars of television and movies," most would think we would be close to being under water. Coming from Al Gore's mouth, himself, (the man who said, "I created the Internet" and stands to gain close to $500 million, if "Cap and Trade" the "Green Church" is a success) said, 5-6 years ago, he felt as though within 15 years, we would have glaciers melting, causing the oceans to gain up to 4-5 feet of water (causing catastrophic problems, across the world). Well, as of now, we are only 4-8 years from Gore's prediction. What have we learned? The "hockey stick information/scale" on global warming, was false and there was countless emails, which were falsified and/or lost/shredded? The "Church of Green" has even been seeped into the actual church's of today, thru the E. P. A.. The E. P. A. has sent out countless memo's to churches of all stripes, leaders, and pastors to encorporate the "Eco-Friendly" message into their sermons, homilies, talks, and overall if they do, money will come their way. This is causing and fueling the Hollywood, Al Gore crowd to howl out, Earth first, God, Capitalism, America second.

Of course, there is two sides to every story, but in today's world we all live in, we are being manipulated thru these three venues, and have been for about 20 years now. If you do not see this, then you are blind, or just do not care to look. I am sure there will be those screaming out "I don't have time to find the facts, read this book, or research multiple sets of ideas." It is always easier to cry out, "I can't make a difference," than actually taking the time, whittling out something in your life, and going strong with belief, rather than just choking down the patented lines, in every paper, most news shows, television shows (killing the American family), and spending endless amounts of cash on movies, which are against what our forefathers taught and believed in. Like I said, there will always be a Marquis De Sade, Rush Limbaugh, MSNBC, and countless other entities, as we go thru life. It is up to every individual to decide for themselves, if they are going to stand on the steps of the Acropolis, the Temple, watch Fox News/MSNBC/CNN, go to see AVATAR, or read "The Turner Diaries." The bottom line, it is up to you, NOT to make excuses on what you can't do, that one person can't make a difference, or just stay ignorant. Then again, you might want to take 30-45 minutes a day to check all channels, get off YouTube and visit intelligent sites (for actual different views on one topic, or major topics we are faced with), and/or read "Time/Newsweek" and then pick up "The Washington Times/Wall Street Journal/The Drudge Report" to check things out for yourself. Ultimately, it is up to you.

Thursday, April 29, 2010

Obama, "You have made enough money," How Much Is That?



Is this to much icing, for these cinnamon rolls? Maybe, maybe not, but it is for the person to decide, right? President Obama started the remark with, "I want to be clear, we are not 'pushing' financial reform', because we begrudge success that is 'fairly earned.' However, he then goes off script, or TelePrompTer (literally), saying, "I do think at a certain point, 'you have made enough money.' If you are providing a good product, or a good service." The only remark, not prepared in his speech ahead of time, he says, (repeating) "You have made enough money."

One can only compare this to some other things in real life, as this comment (I am sure it will be classified, as a 'joke', by the time this hits the news channels, or the mainstream media will classify it as so), is almost to unbelievable. How much it to much sun on a flower? To much sun on a flower, is when the flower dies, or starts to wilt. How much is to much rain? When it starts to flood, is usually when there is to much rain. However, when it is raining for two days, some people can't do construction work, lawn and outdoor work, and other kinds of work and things dealing with the weather. Yet, those same two days of rain, also allow the grass to grow, allow inside merchants, retail shops, and movie theatres to have more people attend, to stay out of the rain. Therefore, it may be "to much" for some, but not "to much" for others. Right? Therefore, how much is "to much money" and why do we have the President of the United States dictating it?

The answer should not surprise anyone. President Obama has been 100% honest, on this topic of "sharing the wealth," "bailing out, as companies are 'to big to fail'," and that he would "fundamentally transform America," but to much money to President Obama and most Dems. on Capitol Hill, is the extra money you do not need to live, in order to give it to those who are less fortunate, poor, in the lower middle to lower monetary class (poor). However, America did not start this cycle with President Obama, as President George W. Bush's last two years (backed by Democrat super majorities), was the start of stimulus and bailing out. Thinking back, President Bush allowed the "Obama transition team" into the White House early, to make a more "seamless transition," on the economy. However, back to the topic at hand, and "to much money?" In Russia, as early as the early to mid 1990's (some still say today, to a lesser degree, myself being one), they practiced the spreading of wealth, Socialist tenants, and trying to make a one class society. This is what Socialism is all about, spreading the wealth and making everyone "equal."

There is one major problem with this whole philosophy, and it is that the "Founding Fathers" never intended for the government to be this much in our business, telling us that we can't have a "day of prayer" (yet, we have a whole week dedicated to "clean earth week/earth week"), Socialized Health Care (which is what the Health Care Law/Bill is, when you are demanded by the government to buy a product, which happens to be health care. It is not reform.), and/or saying "how much money we can make, should make." Showing exactly, what is wrong with Washington, President Obama, and the "lefties" of the country. It flies in the face of our founders, of "The Constitution" and the American way of life for over 300 years (for the most part). President Obama is traveling around the country talking to "regular Americans," though there are strict measures in place to attend the speeches, making it a mainly democrat group, so there is not backlash. Actually, when he made the "to much money" comment, the crowd gave an uneasy, but none the less, acted as if it were a joke, laughing.

Spending is out of control in Washington (across the board), we have countless regimes against us (China holding our debt hostage, Iran with Nuclear aspirations, North Korea just being, well North Korea, etc), and an almost $13 trillion debt, as of now. This is all from the government spending to much money and making more entitlement programs (such as the 116 new bureaucracies, 16,000 IRS agents alone, just for the new Health Care Bill/Law). So let me ask two questions: If there is a "to much money" level for Americans, or that is what Obama and the Democrats want, when will they stop spending? Second, how much, is to much money for you and is this what we want for our country?


copyright. DMAN @ "The Thought Spigot"



Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Gates & Clinton, Get Hints Of Air Strikes From Israel




As time ticks by, over half the "Bush Years" and over a full year into President Obama's first tem, there is still nothing with any teeth on the board, to stop Iran from having nuclear weapons. Yet, the patented line, "we are working with our partners and the U.N.," comes from both Hillary Clinton and Robert Gates. After meeting with Israel's defense minister, Ehud Barak, Gates' response, to reporters was, "I am very satisfied with the planning process in the building and in the inner agency. We spend a lot of time on Iran, and will continue to do so." In contrary to his statement, he also said, "Hamas has more rockets and missiles, than most countries militaries." Hillary Clinton's, minimal words (after meeting with officials from the E. U.), "The United States is working with our partners with the United Nations and the European Union on tough new sanctions that will "further sharpen" the choices that Iran's leaders face." Really?

Of course, most people are not "geo-political experts" and nobody (unless deep in the governments) knows what classified material Israel and "allied nations" are looking at. However, anyone who does have any business experience, at all, knows that if there is a continuous problem, there must be actual actions taken to solve the problem. Therefore, why is it that either Gates and/or Clinton, all of the U. S., E. U., and "allied nations" leaders and delegates not locked in a room, for however long it takes to stop this out of control country? Of course, it is not that simple, nothing in government and world wide politics ever is, but the same principle still applies. If there is time for our "leaders" (world wide), who say they can "walk and chew gum at the same time," to banter about immigration, the economy, housing, and a plethora of other things, then why is there not time and a concerted effort to take a week, two, or a month (four hours a day, till it is done), to put sanctions on Iran (with "teeth" in the sanctions)? Answer, nobody can do anything about Iran, until Russia and China come on board.

The only thing that is going to make Iran stop it's nuclear options are either Iran doing it themselves (which isn't going to happen, by their own rhetoric), the whole free world and the U. N. and N. A. T. O. countries to stop all flow of natural and refined gasoline to Iran (by blocking the "Straight of Hormus," where Iran just got finished having "war games.") and an embargo/trade freeze with Iran across the board (which would definitely hurt the Iranian people and President Obama has said he would not do), or else Israel is going to "temporarily stop" Iran, by using it's superior air power to hit nuclear targets, inside Iran. The problem with the last option, which everyone in the world knows, once Israel starts the air raids (which Barak hinted at, in the press conference, with Gates), Hamas and Hezbollah will open up with massive air/missile strikes. When that happens, it will make the last "War Over Lebanon" look like a walk in the park. Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, and just about all of Israel will be in play, for rocket attacks, and NOBODY knows if they have the biological and/or chemical tips, for those rockets (for sure).

At a stand still for over 6 years, on this issue, it is now up to the United States, President Obama, and the rest of the world to: 1. get those severely tough sanctions in place (making sure that Russia, and China is either on board, or off, but continuing either way, with the majority of the countries backing this. 2. Israel will start the air raids, probably right after the U. S. summer and before elections in the U. S. (as the Prime Minister of Israel and Obama are at odds, and have been, since he has taken office. This proven by the 72% of Israel people stating that they feel President Barack Obama is an "Anti-Semite". (Their words, not mine)

President Obama and the U. S. will have to decide on whether to help, or not, Israel with the Hamas/Hezbollah problem (sure to come), and there is not guarantee on that. 3. Iran will go nuclear. Out of these three steps, the way the problem is being pushed to the back, politicians using nickel and dime tactics (in the U. S. and world wide) to try to stop Iran, and the bold in your face disregard, for world wide sentiment of Iran, it does not look good for the United States, the E. U., or the fact this will start an arms race in the Middle East. Only God knows, what will happen, but let's all not kid ourselves. At the moment, there looks to be NOTHING on the road, looking promising, in stopping Iran from going nuclear. Therefore, Gates, Clinton and ultimately President Obama have made the U. S. look even more weak, then it does economically and world wide, at present. Which is a tough task to do, much less accomplish it. However, tough times and tough questions/problems, deserve tough actions and decisive measures. If President Obama would look at the Iranian problem, like he did the Health Care problem, then the United States might be in another place. At least, he would have done more than President G. W. Bush did, who is still the whipping boy for the left.
Copyright. "TheThoughtSpigot.Com"

Thursday, April 22, 2010

South Park, Moderrate Muslims, & A Milk Toast USA?



Think about this: South Park has made hard core attempts, at satarism on Christ and Christians, Christmas, Easter, Christian Dogma, Jewish Dogma, but for some reason Muslims are off limits? How about all are off limits, or none are off limits? Or better yet, how about the "moderate Muslims" taking their religion back. Rather, than having it "Hi-Jacked" (pun intended), by a bunch of insane sword wielding, head cutting off, IED using, killing civilians (BEFORE Iraq and Afghanistan), and treating their women like cattle? How about that?


Rather than "Matt and Trey" (as the Muslim group called them), punking out, taking the cheap shots at religions who do not fight back, or will not strike out (as a rule, of course there are "wing nuts"/"idiots" in every religion, and those who are completely misguided and violent, WITHOUT religion), maybe "Matt and Trey" could be satirists on things like Obama's Nuclear meeting, Health Care, and/or three legged dogs (I would say former President Bush, but they already had a field day, for eight years with him, in South Park and their movies), I DON'T CARE!


What I do care about, is the majority of "moderate Muslims" NOT speaking up and taking back what is their faith, Christians not doing the same (though they are not taken seriously, when they do, as a rule), and I deeply care that NONE (that I have seen) on TV, have reported on what is happening in Indonesia. Does anyone know that they are battling Al-Queada/Muslim Terrorists in the streets, policemen (just last week) were overrun and killed (with swords and limbs hacked off) in the streets (now they are not wearing "police uniforms" out of fear), but the only thing on Indonesia is that President Obama canceled his trip. Nobody cared to report why, he didn't go, they blamed it on the volcano, but could have taken Air Force I, WEST OVER CALIFORNIA, to get to Indonesia and Australia. Instead, the news has nothing and the government is not talking about any of it at all?


Everyone is "fair game", but Muslims. Why? It is all just ridiculous. Especially, after reading this article, and how they handled it (like a black box and bleeping things, doesn't tell what is going on, this week). Plus, this isn't even a show I would let infect my mind (although, I have seen every example, in an episode somewhere, of what I have sited, in this article). I just don't get this whole "Politically Correct" for some, milk toast, apologize for America first, say anything about any religion (BUT Muslims), and how our country is becoming a caricature of itself, as we sink more and more. GARBAGE!!!! Of course, just my opinion, which everyone is entitled to have. Before responding to this, saying I am drumming up violence and/or saying I am short sighted, realize I can only type so much (without writing a book here), and read the whole article and THINK before you respond.

Peace and God Bless