
Geraldine Ferraro "stepped down," as Hillary Clinton's financial advisor, amongst angst from the Obama campaign. Ferraro said, "Obama would not be where he is [in his Presidential bid], if he was not black." Ferraro, the first woman to ever run for Vice President of the United States, stepped down because of political pressure and media stampeding of her remarks.
However, were those remarks more true, than false? Obama has an impenetrable force field around him, enough of one, even the media would not take any shots at his experience, give tough questions at debates, and even Obama's middle name is "off limits." Of course, Barack Obama did not ask for this to happen, but it has, regardless. The man is "biracial," half Afro-American and half of his genetic make up is Caucasian. Although, the mainstream, television press, print and all other press has only seen his dark skin color, or the side of his past, from Kenya. Therefore, who is pushing the racial component here, the press, or Gerald Ferraro, for pointing out the facts?
Once again, Obama is given another pass and casualties have been taken, in American politics. A country that is tiptoeing around the "black man running for office," rather than looking at the man's policies (or lack of), stances on past issues, and choices he has made throughout his lifetime. When Bill Clinton, in 1992, was running for President, so much was made of "whether he inhaled, or not." Barack Obama, actually did cocaine and smoked weed, by his own words. He said, "I just made some bad choices, on the streets of Chicago, when I was in my youth." Is that the same standards? George W. Bush's past was scrutinized more than, maybe, any other President in history. Although, Obama has received not only a free pass on his peers: Tony Rezco (his self-proclaimed friend and partner in business deals, who is now up on countless charges, including fraud), Jeremiah Wright (his outspoken and blackcentric pastor, who gave a lifetime achievement award to Louis Farrakhan), and finally William "Bill" Ayers. Ayers alone, member of "The Underground Weathermen," a radical antigovernment/terrorist group, who bombed the Pentagon, embassies, and eleven government buildings in all, in the late 1960s to early 1970s, still wishes "he could have done more" and not only does not denounce his action, but revels in them. Is this fair press coverage, considering that none of the major networks will cover Obama's past?
Geraldine Ferraro's comments were not racist, or even out of line. Barack Obama is getting 91% of the Afro-American vote, across the country. His past, in all of the media (except some coverage on Fox News and some Right leaning radio shows) is completely off limits. Off limits, to the effect, Saturday Night Live has done countless skits, over the past three weeks, on what a free ride Obama has received. Anytime there is a hint of a racial component, NOT racism, but a component dealing with race, Al Sharpton, the ACLU, Jesse Jackson, pundits in Obama's camp, and even Obama himself are up in arms, screaming for a retraction and/or someone's job. Geraldine Ferraro is the latest casualty in the "race" problem, of Barack Obama, after her resignation.
It is a shame that a man who is HALF WHITE, cannot see comments for what they are, see racism when it detracts from a candidate and comes to the forefront, and finally that there is no actual dialogue about this historic candidate, only conjecture and politics. When the general election comes, or if Barack Obama actually becomes President of the United States, it will be really interesting to see if he cries every time someone mentions his "black side," skin color, middle name, or makes a mistake thinking he is Muslim. The country needs a leader, not just a "speaker in chief." A leader does not politicize words that are not an attack effect him/her, rather they rise above them and lead the people above the bar. Barack Obama, to date, has not shown any of these traits, and Ms. Ferraro was right in what she said. Obama has been given this spot in history, based on one speech (in the 2004 Democratic National Convention) and his color, because he surely does not have the experience, the actual things to make change (like a thick skin and striving forward, rather than utilizing past strategies of color), and he doesn't even have any "Audacity." Unless, it is the "Audacity of Playing the Race Card."
However, were those remarks more true, than false? Obama has an impenetrable force field around him, enough of one, even the media would not take any shots at his experience, give tough questions at debates, and even Obama's middle name is "off limits." Of course, Barack Obama did not ask for this to happen, but it has, regardless. The man is "biracial," half Afro-American and half of his genetic make up is Caucasian. Although, the mainstream, television press, print and all other press has only seen his dark skin color, or the side of his past, from Kenya. Therefore, who is pushing the racial component here, the press, or Gerald Ferraro, for pointing out the facts?
Once again, Obama is given another pass and casualties have been taken, in American politics. A country that is tiptoeing around the "black man running for office," rather than looking at the man's policies (or lack of), stances on past issues, and choices he has made throughout his lifetime. When Bill Clinton, in 1992, was running for President, so much was made of "whether he inhaled, or not." Barack Obama, actually did cocaine and smoked weed, by his own words. He said, "I just made some bad choices, on the streets of Chicago, when I was in my youth." Is that the same standards? George W. Bush's past was scrutinized more than, maybe, any other President in history. Although, Obama has received not only a free pass on his peers: Tony Rezco (his self-proclaimed friend and partner in business deals, who is now up on countless charges, including fraud), Jeremiah Wright (his outspoken and blackcentric pastor, who gave a lifetime achievement award to Louis Farrakhan), and finally William "Bill" Ayers. Ayers alone, member of "The Underground Weathermen," a radical antigovernment/terrorist group, who bombed the Pentagon, embassies, and eleven government buildings in all, in the late 1960s to early 1970s, still wishes "he could have done more" and not only does not denounce his action, but revels in them. Is this fair press coverage, considering that none of the major networks will cover Obama's past?
Geraldine Ferraro's comments were not racist, or even out of line. Barack Obama is getting 91% of the Afro-American vote, across the country. His past, in all of the media (except some coverage on Fox News and some Right leaning radio shows) is completely off limits. Off limits, to the effect, Saturday Night Live has done countless skits, over the past three weeks, on what a free ride Obama has received. Anytime there is a hint of a racial component, NOT racism, but a component dealing with race, Al Sharpton, the ACLU, Jesse Jackson, pundits in Obama's camp, and even Obama himself are up in arms, screaming for a retraction and/or someone's job. Geraldine Ferraro is the latest casualty in the "race" problem, of Barack Obama, after her resignation.
It is a shame that a man who is HALF WHITE, cannot see comments for what they are, see racism when it detracts from a candidate and comes to the forefront, and finally that there is no actual dialogue about this historic candidate, only conjecture and politics. When the general election comes, or if Barack Obama actually becomes President of the United States, it will be really interesting to see if he cries every time someone mentions his "black side," skin color, middle name, or makes a mistake thinking he is Muslim. The country needs a leader, not just a "speaker in chief." A leader does not politicize words that are not an attack effect him/her, rather they rise above them and lead the people above the bar. Barack Obama, to date, has not shown any of these traits, and Ms. Ferraro was right in what she said. Obama has been given this spot in history, based on one speech (in the 2004 Democratic National Convention) and his color, because he surely does not have the experience, the actual things to make change (like a thick skin and striving forward, rather than utilizing past strategies of color), and he doesn't even have any "Audacity." Unless, it is the "Audacity of Playing the Race Card."